Association between watching wide show as a reliable COVID-19 information source and preventive behaviors: A nationwide survey in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Current pandemic prompted a surge in the television (TV) news watching. However, its influence is poorly understood. In Japan, wide show, a major genre of soft news TV programs, broadcasted COVID-19 for long hours, and was pointed out that it broadcasted COVID-19 sensationally, arousing fear and anxiety, and that it criticized individuals gathering in closed places. Thus, wide show may promote preventive behaviors but also produce fear or anxiety and aggressiveness towards others not engaging in preventive behaviors. We examined this issue using large-scale nationwide data. METHODS: We analyzed the cross-sectional data of 25,482 individuals from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey conducted in 2020. Participants reported the type of COVID-19 information sources including TV news and wide show, and their trustworthiness. We calculated multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of engaging in recommended preventive behaviors strictly (defined as always engaging in hand washing, mask wearing, and attempting to keep physical distancing) and alerting others not engaging in preventive behaviors, respectively. RESULTS: About 72.4% of the participants obtained information from TV news with reliance, while corresponding values were 50.3% for wide show. Overall, 32.8% engaged in recommended preventive behaviors strictly, and 9.6% alerted others. Watching wide show both with and without reliance were significantly associated with alerting others (adjusted PRs: 1.48 and 1.34, respectively) but not associated with preventive behaviors. Watching TV news was neither associated with strict preventive behaviors nor alerting others. CONCLUSION: Watching TV news and wide show was not associated with strict preventive behaviors; watching wide show was associated with only alerting others. Although causality is unclear, actions may be needed for TV stations broadcasting wide show to understand own influences on society in a timely manner amid the health emergencies.

Health literacy and COVID-19-related beliefs and behaviors: a longitudinal study of the Japanese general population.

Since the outbreak of novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), health communication has played a critical role in the process of disease prevention. Based on the concepts of health literacy and protection motivation theory, this study longitudinally examined the relationship between general health literacy measured immediately before the COVID-19 outbreak, and COVID-19-related information utilization, health literacy, beliefs and protective behaviors during the subsequent year in the Japanese general population. The participants were 767 Japanese residents who completed self-administered questionnaire surveys in January 2020 and February 2021. Based on the hypotheses, we constructed and tested a path model to predict the adoption of protective behaviors. Higher health literacy in 2020 was significantly related to higher COVID-19-related health literacy in 2021, which, in turn, was related to the adoption of recommended protective behaviors both directly and indirectly through threat and coping appraisal. Coping appraisal, but not threat appraisal, significantly differed by health literacy level. Generic health literacy skills for accessing, understanding and applying health information may enable people to better adapt to specific health risks. Our findings provide guidance for future health literacy education and health risk communication in populations with different health literacy levels.

Declines in health literacy and health-related quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study of the Japanese general population.

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the importance of health literacy (HL) was addressed by public health researchers. We longitudinally examined the changes in general HL and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between immediately before the COVID-19 outbreak and 1 year later, and how general HL before the outbreak was related to changes in HRQOL in the Japanese general population. METHODS: Among the Japanese residents aged 20-79 years who participated in our previous study in 2017, 826 were followed-up via self-administered questionnaires in January 2020 and February 2021, for the purposes of this study. The HRQOL was measured using the SF-8, a short version of the SF-36 Health Survey, and general HL was measured using the short form of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HL-SF12) in the 2020 and 2021 surveys. RESULTS: The physical and mental dimensions of HRQOL as well as general HL declined significantly from immediately before the COVID-19 outbreak to 1 year later (p = .010, p < .001 and p < .001, respectively). The decline in HRQOL, especially the mental dimension, was more significant among women. A lower economic status was also related to a greater decline in HRQOL (p = .026 for the physical dimension and p = .012 for the mental dimension). Higher general HL before the COVID-19 outbreak was associated with a lesser decline in HRQOL in both the physical and mental dimensions (p = .040 and p < .001, respectively) after controlling for possible confounding variables such as gender and economic status. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare support is crucial for vulnerable populations during and after the pandemic. General HL may be important for attenuating the decline in HRQOL, by enabling effective use of health information and adaptive behaviors toward health threats. Further studies are needed to better understand the association between HL and HRQOL.

Readability assessment of vaccine information: A systematic review for addressing vaccine hesitancy.

OBJECTIVE: Vaccine hesitancy is a problem attracting growing attention and concern. Communication can be an effective tool to counteract vaccine hesitancy and promote optimal vaccine uptake. Readability has been recognized as one of the more important aspects of health communication for achieving good health literacy. We reviewed studies of readability assessment in the area of vaccine communication. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in September 2020, using four online databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycArticles, and PsycINFO). We included studies that assessed the readability level of online and offline vaccine information materials. RESULTS: We found 12 articles that were appropriate for inclusion. Ten of the studies were published after 2016. The readability levels of the majority of the materials assessed were found to be difficult and higher than 8th-grade level. CONCLUSION: Readability assessments of vaccine information are scarce. The limited evidence shows that the readability level of vaccine information supplied by health care providers is more difficult to read than recommended. More studies on the readability of vaccine information are recommended. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Difficulty reading vaccine information may influence attitudes toward acceptance of or hesitancy to take vaccines. It is recommended that health care professionals use guidelines and tools to create easy-to-read vaccine information.